Skip to main content

A Better Way to Achieve Equity in Education

With well over 700 million people living in rural areas of India, a great majority of the nation’s children are enrolled in government schools. So much has been written about the deplorable quality of education offered by most of these schools attended primarily by children from poor families. Over 75% of the population in India earn less than $2 per day, and their children do not have the financial means to attend better quality private schools. Consequently, there is now a two-tier system of education in India – better quality education for those who can afford private schools, and poor quality education for all others.

During the past several decades, Central and State governments had launched many initiatives to improve their rural schools. These programs have increased enrolments to well over 90% at primary and secondary levels, and more girls attend schools. Literacy rates have risen significantly. But there is very little improvement in the quality of education offered. Only a small percentage of the children attending governments schools are well prepared to pursue higher education in colleges that offer quality programs. A great majority of high school graduates who seek higher education enroll in government colleges that do not offer good instruction. The result is that most students graduating from schools and colleges in India are not prepared to meet the employment needs of industries for today’s global marketplace.

Instead of trying to improve the quality of education offered by government schools and colleges, the authorities seem to be more interested in leveling the playing field through mediocrity, if not substandard quality. In the name of social justice and equity, government regulations and practices make operation of private schools difficult. If some of the proposed rules go into effect, even those private schools that do not receive government assistance will be required to admit students who have not demonstrated satisfactory academic performance to be able to keep up with the higher academic standard of those institutions. Further, without the ability to charge sufficient fees for study, these private schools cannot afford good teachers and offer a good program. The net result is that private schools will also lower their standard.

The injustice of the achievement gap between the children of the poor and the rich must be closed. The question is how? Nothing is gained by enacting rules that would de facto result in lowering the quality of education offered by private schools. Instead, the focus must entirely be on improving government schools where children from poor families attend.

I believe deeply in social justice and equity. It must be achieved by sensible and positive measures. In this case, the government should be the catalyst in improving all schools. It must play direct and indirect roles in achieving such an outcome.

Of course, there are many factors that influence student learning and achievement. Of all those factors, the most important one is teachers. I know from my personal experience running Shanti Bhavan that effective teachers – those who not only have the highest expectations of their students, but also have the desire and the ability to help them achieve those expectations – are the most important ingredient in this undertaking.

Until such time the nation finds a way to adequately train and motivate teachers and hold them accountable, the education gap will remain. I pray that the government will be wise enough not to attempt to close that gap by lowering achievement among the few who can afford to join quality institutions. By improving the quality of education offered by all schools and colleges, both private and government-run, there will be millions more young adults each year having the required educational background to seek skilled jobs. There is no superior strategy than this to achieve higher productivity from the workforce to create far greater national wealth.


Written by Dr. Abraham M. George

Please visit us at www.shantibhavanonline.org and www.tgfworld.org

Comments

online said…
Understand that people think that in the name of social justice and equity, government regulations and practices make operation of private schools difficult. But everything has its time.
As many as 25 States/Union Territories in India are likely to have halved their 1990 levels of poverty earlier or around 2015. There is optimism that the country will be able to achieve universal primary education by 2015 and eliminate the enrolment gap between boys and girls by then. The government also claims that it is on course in controlling the incidence of HIV/AIDS, malaria and tuberculosis and expects to achieve the MDGs target for sustainable access to safe drinking water by the designated year. http://bit.ly/dl9Cgt

Popular posts from this blog

Simple Solutions to the Rural Education Crisis

It seems many people are trying to find innovative solutions to improving the quality of education in rural areas, especially among the poor. Since most rural children study at government-run schools, the focus of any effort to improve quality and performance must be on those institutions. Without waiting for the state government to act, NGOs can directly interact with the administrators of those schools, especially the headmasters, and village leaders to implement measures that can yield positive results. That is precisely what The George Foundation has been doing since 2004 in the 17 villages surrounding its own school, Shanti Bhavan.

Three years ago our foundation initiated a community development plan that included working with government-run schools in our area. Deverapalli Government School was the first one we took on, and within two years of starting the program, it was judged as the “best” in the district by the educational authorities. Based on this project and our Shanti Bha…

A Second Front

It has been quite a while since I wrote my last blog. For some reason, I had concluded that there wasn’t enough readership interest in my personal notes and critiques of the country’s system. But recently, a friend of mine who stumbled upon my earlier blogs urged me to continue. Moreover, I had promised in my last blog to write about my experiences as an artillery officer along India’s western border with Pakistan, but I hadn’t kept my word. So finally I made up my mind to venture into writing blogs once again. My medical leave following the dynamite explosion in which I was injured while at Se La Pass was to last six weeks. I had returned home to Trivandrum sufficiently frost bitten to have my large ear lobes and nose turn dark, and skin pealing like a snake’s scales. It was a central topic in several hilarious conversations with guests when they visited our home, and I had a lot of stories to tell about my adventures in the snow-covered mountains of the Himalayas. Everyone wanted to …

Rape, Incest and Other Contradictions

The recent Delhi rape incident has elevated national attention about nonconsensual sex and violence.There is no doubt that most reasonable people disapprove sexual violence against women. Yet, the picture about what constitutes rape is not clear in India. The subject is further complicated without any legal guidance on incest.
For the starter, let me briefly describe the laws in India. Marriage for girls is permitted after 18 (except Muslim girls who may marry at 15) and 21 for boys.  But many underage marriages take place, and the government does not intervene. Sex with a “minor wife” below the age of 15 is punishable. But no one bothers if a man marries a girl below 15 as long as the couple does not disclose that they had sex with each other.
There is no law in India concerning incest, often described as having sex between a parent and a child, or between siblings. If one is to believe ancient Indian writings, incest was not very uncommon. Today in India, sex with a close relative gir…