Skip to main content

The Per Capita Game

First the good news. Finance Minister Chidambaram stated on November 6, 2007 that the country has already exceeded a BRIC (Goldman Sachs investment bank report on Brazil, Russia, India and China) forecast of India's per capita income of $800 by 2010 and $1,149 by 2015. According to him, “we have exploded this assumption as our per capita income has already touched $1,000 this year and expect it to touch $4,000 by 2025."

Let us consider both sets of forecasts. BRIC forecast calls for a per capita income of Rs. 88 ($2.20) per day by 2010 and Rs. 126 ($3.15) by 2015. By contrast, the finance minister expects daily per capita income of Rs. 110 ($2.75) by this year and Rs. 438 ($10.95) by 2025. These forecasts compare against a daily per capita income of Rs. 82 ($2.05) estimated for 2007 (in nominal terms) in several published studies.

Per capita income should be calculated by dividing total personal income by the population. It is not calculated by dividing total output measures like GNP or GDP, which gives an exaggerated picture of per capita income. Only if a nominal (at current prices) GDP figure of $1.1 trillion and an exchange rate of Rs. 40/$ are used can one arrive at a daily per capita income of Rs. 110 ($2.75) for 2007. But that wouldn’t be correct.

Leave aside these discrepancies for a moment; after all, everyone wants to hear good news. The real question is whether the rapid rise in national per capita income is reflective of prosperity for all.

It was just two months back when India’s Central Ministry of Statistics reported that the daily per capita income of the rural population was Rs. 18.50 ($0.46) in 2005. With rural income rising no more than 5% per annum, the best estimate for 2007 is around Rs. 20.40 ($0.51). This estimate is consistent with the recent report by the National Commission for Enterprises in the Unorganized Sector (NCEUS) showing that 77% of Indians in 2004-2005 -- about 836 million people -- live on less than Rs. 20 ($0.50) a day. Obviously, there is a wide gap between the national daily per capita income figure of Rs. 110 ($2.75) estimated by the finance minister and the rural figure of Rs. 20.40 ($0.51) for 2007.

Even more troubling is the widening trend between national and rural figures. If we are to assume that rural per capita will increase by the same percentage as the change in national figure between 2007 and 2025, the gap between national and rural per capita will only widen from Rs. 90 ($2.25) in 2007 to Rs. 358 ($8.95) by 2025 – a whopping 400% increase. Undoubtedly, we have a society that does not share equitably the benefits of a growing aggregate economy.

The fact is that much of the rise in overall per capita income comes from the rapidly increasing personal income of the 34 million or so of people employed in the nation’s organized sector. These are the people who benefit most from the current economic expansion. Less than 10% of the nation’s population contribute to more than 90% of the growth in GDP and incomes.

The real test is in how the poor are benefited. With 770 million people living in the villages, and over 80% of them on less than Rs. 20 ($0.50) per day, what can we forecast about their future? All this talk about national per capita income adds up to very little when a great majority of people in the country is likely to remain below $1 per day in income even after another decade.

Please visit us at and


Saravanan said…
This is an amazing piece of statistics,which throws light on the true plight of the Indian population.The present economic boom due to globalisation and IT sector is being utilised only by the people living in towns and cities and they belong to the middle or upper class.In my college too,I find no one coming from a poor family(with a income less than $1 a day),and it is only students from these colleges go into jobs of the IT sector and earn huge salaries..and the future of the millions of people living in the villages depending on the petty sum they get everyday remains a big Question mark
Vik said…
Great piece of information. I did a google search but had hard time getting an authentic information about rural folks in India. Govt knows this fact but deliberately suppress it. I am very surprized that why the govt is not planning any thing to rectify this distortion. Now I know why wherever you go in India, you see nothing but poverty all over.I think, govt of the day, instead of hiding these facts, should immeditely start working towards the poverty eradication. UPA govt' schemes such as NREGA are just a eye wash as they are aimed at poverty eradication, but their failure rate is reported to be over 94%.

Popular posts from this blog

Simple Solutions to the Rural Education Crisis

It seems many people are trying to find innovative solutions to improving the quality of education in rural areas, especially among the poor. Since most rural children study at government-run schools, the focus of any effort to improve quality and performance must be on those institutions. Without waiting for the state government to act, NGOs can directly interact with the administrators of those schools, especially the headmasters, and village leaders to implement measures that can yield positive results. That is precisely what The George Foundation has been doing since 2004 in the 17 villages surrounding its own school, Shanti Bhavan.

Three years ago our foundation initiated a community development plan that included working with government-run schools in our area. Deverapalli Government School was the first one we took on, and within two years of starting the program, it was judged as the “best” in the district by the educational authorities. Based on this project and our Shanti Bha…

Self-confidence, the Answer to Better Learning

I am frequently asked by visitors to Shanti Bhavan from America whether our educational model would work in the West.  They are curious to know how caste and class prejudices experienced in India can be overcome by our graduates when they enter the workplace. These are complicated questions, and they need a broad explanation that cannot be fully covered in this blog. The landmark 1954 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in the case Brown v. Board of Education was meant to rectify the unequal status of racially separate schools. Now, even after several decades of desegregation measures, including busing children from some affluent families to poor neighborhood schools, their impact on the academic progress of minorities is being questioned. Many factors contribute to reducing the achievement gap in American schools, and racial integration may not necessarily be a solution to the difficulties faced in lifting the educational levels of minority students. As an Asian immigrant who came to America fif…

A Second Front

It has been quite a while since I wrote my last blog. For some reason, I had concluded that there wasn’t enough readership interest in my personal notes and critiques of the country’s system. But recently, a friend of mine who stumbled upon my earlier blogs urged me to continue. Moreover, I had promised in my last blog to write about my experiences as an artillery officer along India’s western border with Pakistan, but I hadn’t kept my word. So finally I made up my mind to venture into writing blogs once again. My medical leave following the dynamite explosion in which I was injured while at Se La Pass was to last six weeks. I had returned home to Trivandrum sufficiently frost bitten to have my large ear lobes and nose turn dark, and skin pealing like a snake’s scales. It was a central topic in several hilarious conversations with guests when they visited our home, and I had a lot of stories to tell about my adventures in the snow-covered mountains of the Himalayas. Everyone wanted to …