Skip to main content

Who can “fix” poverty?

For long, we have been relying on the government to fix the problem of poverty. Then we thought that NGOs will somehow solve the problem. Now we think private companies, through their “corporate social responsibility” (CSR) programs, will significantly reduce poverty.

Many companies in India have formed CSR departments that make donations and involve themselves in initiatives designed to help the poor. But for the most part, the CSR movement appears to be a public relations campaign or a “feel good” effort, and less of any major assistance to the poor. The little that the companies do is somehow tied to publicity and favors to politicians, and often an indirect way to sell their products. Companies have figured out ways to extract government grants for their CSR activities, and hence, minimize their own contributions. Regardless of all these, if even small benefit goes to the poor, it is well and good.

I like to see corporations investing in the rural sector. They must be required to pay wages that allow families to support themselves. They must offer at least minimum benefits for employee healthcare and educational support. They must not damage the environment. If they would do just these – be socially conscious citizens --, it is more than sufficient. Unfortunately, even those companies that have CSR programs do not adhere to these simple principles.

Governments must offer sufficient incentives for companies to invest in the rural and deprived communities by way of soft loans, infrastructure improvements, tax breaks, etc., and keep out of the process except for enforcement of labor laws, worker safety and environmental protection. Market forces will automatically take hold. The trouble is that neither the government nor the companies do their part.

We are under the illusion that poverty can be solved by NGOs and the government. Now we are beginning to think that the CSR movement will. Both NGOs and governments have roles to play, but the real solution is in creating vibrant economic activity. This is the lesson I have learnt from our Baldev Farms and other work in Tamil Nadu.

Please visit us at and


Saravanan said…
Dear Sir,
It is really obvious that the poor who live on the money that they earn in a day ,which is almost the pocket money of most college students for a day,must be given a more practical oppurtunity and increased wages ,if one tries to improve their state.
At present ,the government and politicians are more concerned in methods to improve GDPs and FDIs rather in alleviating the poverty of our fellow citizens.
joe said…
Thanks for sharing this post with us. It's really an amazing post. Keep posting the good work in future too.
Business Loan

Popular posts from this blog

Simple Solutions to the Rural Education Crisis

It seems many people are trying to find innovative solutions to improving the quality of education in rural areas, especially among the poor. Since most rural children study at government-run schools, the focus of any effort to improve quality and performance must be on those institutions. Without waiting for the state government to act, NGOs can directly interact with the administrators of those schools, especially the headmasters, and village leaders to implement measures that can yield positive results. That is precisely what The George Foundation has been doing since 2004 in the 17 villages surrounding its own school, Shanti Bhavan.

Three years ago our foundation initiated a community development plan that included working with government-run schools in our area. Deverapalli Government School was the first one we took on, and within two years of starting the program, it was judged as the “best” in the district by the educational authorities. Based on this project and our Shanti Bha…

Self-confidence, the Answer to Better Learning

I am frequently asked by visitors to Shanti Bhavan from America whether our educational model would work in the West.  They are curious to know how caste and class prejudices experienced in India can be overcome by our graduates when they enter the workplace. These are complicated questions, and they need a broad explanation that cannot be fully covered in this blog. The landmark 1954 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in the case Brown v. Board of Education was meant to rectify the unequal status of racially separate schools. Now, even after several decades of desegregation measures, including busing children from some affluent families to poor neighborhood schools, their impact on the academic progress of minorities is being questioned. Many factors contribute to reducing the achievement gap in American schools, and racial integration may not necessarily be a solution to the difficulties faced in lifting the educational levels of minority students. As an Asian immigrant who came to America fif…

A Second Front

It has been quite a while since I wrote my last blog. For some reason, I had concluded that there wasn’t enough readership interest in my personal notes and critiques of the country’s system. But recently, a friend of mine who stumbled upon my earlier blogs urged me to continue. Moreover, I had promised in my last blog to write about my experiences as an artillery officer along India’s western border with Pakistan, but I hadn’t kept my word. So finally I made up my mind to venture into writing blogs once again. My medical leave following the dynamite explosion in which I was injured while at Se La Pass was to last six weeks. I had returned home to Trivandrum sufficiently frost bitten to have my large ear lobes and nose turn dark, and skin pealing like a snake’s scales. It was a central topic in several hilarious conversations with guests when they visited our home, and I had a lot of stories to tell about my adventures in the snow-covered mountains of the Himalayas. Everyone wanted to …